{"id":297,"date":"2013-10-10T17:27:21","date_gmt":"2013-10-10T17:27:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cornellilj.org\/?p=297"},"modified":"2013-10-10T17:27:21","modified_gmt":"2013-10-10T17:27:21","slug":"russian-federation-the-snowden-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/2013\/10\/10\/russian-federation-the-snowden-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Russian Federation: The Snowden Decision, Vol. 1"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

CC Image Courtesy of Thierry Ehrmann<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russian Federation: The Snowden Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

by Alex Kerrigan*<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Earlier this year, Edward Snowden, a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), leaked classified information related to a surveillance program under which the U.S. was spying on both foreign and domestic citizens.[1] After working for the NSA for several months, Snowden could not allow the \u201cU.S. government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they’re secretly building.\u201d[2] Once he copied the necessary information, Snowden left his home in Hawaii and headed for Hong Kong without informing anyone\u2014including his family and girlfriend.[3] From Hong Kong, Snowden departed for Moscow with the intent of seeking asylum.[4] In response to Snowden\u2019s request, Moscow granted him one-year temporary asylum. Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin claimed that Russia had no option but to allow Mr. Snowden to stay because the U.S. had refused to sign an extradition treaty with Russia.[5]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On legal grounds, this statement is untrue since Russia always had the option of denying Snowden asylum and turning him over to American authorities. Further, based on Putin\u2019s subsequent comments, it is unlikely that Russia\u2019s actions were dictated by Snowden\u2019s principals of liberty.[6] Thus, Russia must have had some other motive for retaining Snowden. One possible motive is Russia\u2019s desire to establish an extradition treaty with the U.S. Another is that Russia is using Snowden as a political pawn which it may sacrifice in the future. This article explores these two motives and the legal background for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russia Was Not Obligated in Either Direction<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Generally, in order for the U.S. to request that a criminal be extradited from a foreign country, two prerequisites must be met: (1) the U.S. has an extradition treaty with that country; and (2) the fugitive has been formally charged with a crime.[7] Although the U.S. has extradition treaties with over 100 other countries, the Russian Federation is not one of them.[8] Thus, as the Russian Foreign Ministry\u2019s Konstantin Dolgov has pointed out, Moscow was under no legal obligation to hand over Snowden.[9]<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the lack of a formal extradition treaty does not mean Russia had<\/em> to grant asylum. U.S. officials requested that Russia deny asylum and turn over Snowden, contending that they have returned multiple fugitives that Russia has requested in the past and, therefore, Russia should do the same.[10] However, even at the risk of damaging U.S. relations, Russia shirked U.S. requests and granted asylum to Snowden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Snowden as a Means to an Extradition Treaty<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin[11] and the Foreign Ministry\u2019s statements suggest that Russia could be using Snowden as leverage for the adoption of an extradition treaty. Recent history supports this theory. In 2009, Russia urged the U.S. to sign a bilateral extradition agreement.[12] Moreover, in 2012 Russia revisited this proposal and suggested, at the very least, joining existing international conventions.[13] However, both these efforts failed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, this explanation is not without faults. Even if the United States did have an extradition agreement with Russia, it would likely contain a political crimes exception, [14] and such exceptions arguably include acts like those committed by Snowden.[15] Further, Russia itself would be able to determine whether his acts fall within the scope of the exception. Thus, if a typical extradition treaty was adopted, Russia likely would still have the option of retaining Snowden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both the U.S. and Russia are undoubtedly aware of this issue, which slightly undermines the proposition that an extradition treaty is the motivation for Russia granting asylum. Given its current advantageous legal position, Russia is unlikely to settle for a substandard extradition treaty without provisions for political crimes. And the United States is unlikely to adopt an extradition treaty that, by its terms, wouldn\u2019t allow the U.S. to extradite Snowden. With these considerations in mind, the extradition-treaty theory becomes problematic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, the U.S. and Russia could always adopt a typical extradition treaty, and Russia could hand over Snowden before (or in spite of) the implementation of the treaty\u2019s political crimes provision. This approach\u2014which would throw Snowden under the bus\u2014would give both parties what they want.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Snowden as a Political Pawn<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another possible motive is that Putin is using Snowden as a pawn, allowing him to stay in Russia on a year-to-year renewal basis until Snowden\u2019s benefit outweighs his liability to U.S.-Russian relations, or Washington offers some type of deal for turning him over.[16] Snowden\u2019s current arrangement seems to support this hypothesis because he lacks legal grounds for any permanent stay in the country. While Snowden may intend to stay in Russia as long as possible and assimilate into Russian culture,[17] Russia\u2019s laws on asylum tend to tell a different story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Russia has three options for asylum: political asylum, refugee status, and temporary asylum.[18] The option for political asylum\u2014the only permanent option\u2014is likely precluded by provision 5 of the Russian government\u2019s resolution, which states that political asylum will not be granted to those who come from a country with established democratic institutions in the protection of human rights.[19] Under Russia\u2019s Law on Refugees, refugee status lasts up to three years, but is reviewed every year.[20] The law states, \u201ctemporary refugee [status] may be granted to a foreign national . . . if they . . . have no [other] grounds for . . . recognition as [a] refugee[] due to the circumstances under the Federal Law, but cannot be deported beyond the territory of the Russian Federation [for] humane motives.\u201d[21] According to Radio Free Europe, Snowden applied for temporary asylum.[22] This application likely means that, under Russian law, he does not meet the requirements for refugee status. Thus, it appears that Snowden is stuck with a one-year asylum arrangement with the Kremlin, something that makes him an easy chip to trade should Russia need to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Russia\u2019s official explanation for granting asylum doesn\u2019t hold water, other explanations fair better. Russia may be using Snowden as leverage for adopting an extradition treating, or it may be using Snowden as a pawn for another scheme down the road. In either case, the Russian Federation\u2019s actions probably weren\u2019t motivated by Snowden\u2019s conceptions of privacy and liberty and certainly weren\u2019t mandated under international or Russian law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a PDF of this article in formal, law-journal format, click here<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Citation: <\/strong>Alex Kerrigan, Russian Federation: The Snowden Decision<\/em>, 1 Cornell Int’l L.J. Online 27 (2013).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

* Alex Kerrigan is a J.D. candidate at Cornell Law School, where he is the Cornell International Law Journal<\/em>\u2019s Associate on Russian Affairs and a research associate for the Legal Information Institute. He holds a B.A. from the University of South Carolina, where he studied criminal justice and Russian.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[1] Barbara Starr & Holly Yan, Man Behind NSA Leaks<\/em>, CNN, http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2013\/06\/10\/politics\/edward-snowden-profile\/index.html (last updated June 23, 2013).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] Id.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3] Id.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[4] Vladimir Radyuhin, Snowden Contacted Us from Hong Kong for Asylum: Putin<\/em>, The Hindu (Sept. 5, 2013), http:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/news\/international\/snowden-contacted-us-from-hong-kong-for-asylum-putin\/article5093926.ece.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[5] Id.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

[6] Id. <\/em>(\u201c[They said to Putin,] \u2018He fights [for] human rights, freedom of information, [and] against violation of U.S. and international legislation\u2019. [Putin said]: \u2018So what? If he wants to stay in our country he is welcome, but in such case he must stop all activity that could undermine Russian-American relations . . .\u2019\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[7] See<\/em> 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3184.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[8] See <\/em>18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3181, available at<\/em> http:\/\/www.state.gov\/documents\/organization\/71600.pdf (listing extradition agreements).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[9] Russia Not Obliged to Return Snowden<\/em>, RIA Novosti (July 31, 2013, 7:10 PM), http:\/\/en.rian.ru\/politics\/20130731\/182512997\/Russia-Not-Obliged-to-Return-Snowden–Russian-Diplomat.html.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[10] Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[11] Russia\u2019s Only Choice is to Permit Snowden to Live Here: All Eyes on Snowden<\/em>, RT (Sept. 5, 2013), http:\/\/rt.com\/news\/putin-interview-ap-channel1-431\/ (quoting Putin as saying \u201cSo what we were supposed to do now? Send him back? Then let\u2019s draw up an extradition treaty, and you\u2019ll give us our criminals. If you don\u2019t want to, fine. But why do you demand his extradition on a unilateral basis?\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[12] Alexey Nikolsky, Russia Urges U.S. to Sign Bilateral Extradition Treaty<\/em>, RIA Novosti (Nov. 5, 2009, 10:00 AM), http:\/\/en.rian.ru\/russia\/20091105\/156715699.html.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[13] Alexander Utkin, Russia Proposes Bilateral Extradition Treaty with U.S.<\/em>, RIA Novosti (Feb. 10, 2012, 6:42 PM), http:\/\/en.rian.ru\/russia\/20120210\/171243300.html.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[14] See, e.g.<\/em>, Treaty of Extradition, Surrender of Fugitive Offenders, U.S.-H.K., art. VI, Dec. 20, 1996, available at<\/em> http:\/\/www.state.gov\/documents\/organization\/208059.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[15] See<\/em> Vincent Defabo, Terrorist or Revolutionary: The Development of the Political Offender Exception and Its Effects on Defining Terrorism in International Law<\/em>, 2 Am. U. Nat\u2019l Security L. Brief, 69, 76\u201377 (2012), available at<\/em> http:\/\/digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu\/cgi\/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=nslb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[16] See <\/em>generally, Brian Fung, How Edward Snowden Became a Pawn in International Politics<\/em>, Wash. Post (Aug. 7, 2013, 10:43 AM), http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/the-switch\/wp\/2013\/08\/07\/how-edward-snowden-became-a-pawn-in-international-politics\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[17] See<\/em> Radyuhin, supra<\/em> note 4.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[18] Tom Balmforth, Explainer: How Do You Get Asylum in Russia?<\/em>, Radio Free Europe (July 26, 2013), http:\/\/www.rferl.org\/content\/explainer-russia-asylum\/25057895.html.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[19] See<\/em> \u041f\u041e\u041b\u041e\u0416\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415 \u041e \u041f\u041e\u0420\u042f\u0414\u041a\u0415 \u041f\u0420\u0415\u0414\u041e\u0421\u0422\u0410\u0412\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0418\u042f \u0420\u041e\u0421\u0421\u0418\u0419\u0421\u041a\u041e\u0419 \u0424\u0415\u0414\u0415\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u0415\u0419 \u041f\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u041e\u0413\u041e \u0423\u0411\u0415\u0416\u0418\u0429\u0410 [Position On the Order of the Russian Federation Political Asylum] (July 21, 1997) (Russ.), available at <\/em>http:\/\/www.fms.gov.ru\/upload\/iblock\/ukazN_746.pdf; Balmforth, supra<\/em> note 26.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[20] Id<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[21] Federal Law on Refugees, 2004, No. 4528-I, art. 12(2)(2) (Russ.), available at<\/em> http:\/\/www.legislationline.org\/documents\/id\/3986; Balmforth, supra<\/em> note 26.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[22] Id.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CC Image Courtesy of Thierry Ehrmann Russian Federation: The Snowden Decision by Alex Kerrigan* Earlier this year, Edward Snowden, a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), leaked classified information related to a surveillance program under which the U.S. was spying on both foreign and domestic citizens.[1] After working for the NSA for several months,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":298,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,17],"tags":[148,347],"class_list":["post-297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles-2","category-forum-archive","tag-edward-snowden","tag-russian-immigration"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=297"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/297\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=297"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=297"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=297"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}