{"id":4020,"date":"2024-05-24T20:30:19","date_gmt":"2024-05-24T20:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cornellilj.org\/?p=4020"},"modified":"2025-03-12T12:46:14","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T12:46:14","slug":"drugs-death-and-deterrence-a-critical-discussion-of-singapores-use-of-the-death-penalty-in-drug-trafficking-cases-vol-56","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/2024\/05\/24\/drugs-death-and-deterrence-a-critical-discussion-of-singapores-use-of-the-death-penalty-in-drug-trafficking-cases-vol-56\/","title":{"rendered":"Drugs, Death, and Deterrence: A Critical Discussion of Singapore&#8217;s Use of the Death Penalty in Drug Trafficking Cases, Vol. 56"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Over the course of the past half century, the topic of the death penalty had been hotly contested.  The late 1980s marked the beginning of a movement against the imposition of mandatory capital punishment sentences.  Various governing bodies, tribunals, protocols, and conventions have since established that the death penalty is no longer a legitimate punishment against any crime.  Despite this, the death penalty has not be established as illegal under international law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the course of the past half century, the topic of the death penalty had been hotly contested. The late 1980s marked the beginning of a movement against the imposition of mandatory capital punishment sentences. Various governing bodies, tribunals, protocols, and conventions have since established that the death penalty is no longer a legitimate punishment&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4022,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,20,22,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured-note","category-notes","category-print-archive","category-volume-56-issue-1"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4020"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4020\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4116,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4020\/revisions\/4116"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}