{"id":4142,"date":"2025-03-10T13:03:54","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T13:03:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/?p=4142"},"modified":"2026-02-19T19:47:17","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T19:47:17","slug":"voice-prevention-remedy-key-elements-in-a-global-supply-chain-convention-vol-57-fall-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/2025\/03\/10\/voice-prevention-remedy-key-elements-in-a-global-supply-chain-convention-vol-57-fall-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Voice, Prevention, Remedy: Key Elements in a Global Supply Chain Convention (Vol. 57, Issue 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Borrowing from Albert Hirschman\u2019s classic work, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, focused on deteriorating performance in economic organizations, this Article explores the interplay among three key elements of a proposed International Convention on Global Supply Chains (GSCs). In doing so, it suggests that Hirschman\u2019s model may not have adequately appreciated the distinctive role of power in the labor setting\u2014 in particular the power that frms possess over the job security and conditions of workers. The Article emphasizes the importance of \u201cVoice\u201d as applied to the precarious labor relationships that characterize transnational supply chains. The structure of these relationships makes Exit unlikely and Loyalty less relevant. Relatedly, conditions in GSCs invite, if not demand, creation of institutions that can effectively communicate worker complaints.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Borrowing from Albert Hirschman\u2019s classic work, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, focused on deteriorating performance in economic organizations, this Article explores the interplay among three key elements of a proposed International Convention on Global Supply Chains (GSCs). In doing so, it suggests that Hirschman\u2019s model may not have adequately appreciated the distinctive role of power in&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,22,444],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4142","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-2","category-print-archive","category-volume-57-issue-1"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4142"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4333,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4142\/revisions\/4333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}