 {"id":4254,"date":"2025-07-15T04:51:56","date_gmt":"2025-07-15T04:51:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/?p=4254"},"modified":"2026-02-19T19:50:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-19T19:50:14","slug":"industrial-policy-and-the-new-internationalism-after-the-liberal-international-order-vol-57-2-spring-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/2025\/07\/15\/industrial-policy-and-the-new-internationalism-after-the-liberal-international-order-vol-57-2-spring-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Industrial Policy and the New Internationalism: After the Liberal International Order, (Vol. 57.2, Spring 2025)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Financial and economic crises, pandemics, border closures, supply chain disruptions, wars, political uncertainty have fundamentally changed the way governments view economic development. Broad-based government interventions are now the order of the day. Many names have been given to the emerging new economics of in-tervention: \u201chomeland economics,\u201d the \u201cnew productivism paradigm,\u201d \u201csupply side progressivism,\u201d \u201cneomercantilism,\u201d \u201cnew industrial policy,\u201d or \u201cBidenomics\u201d\u2014in short, for the purposes of the article: \u201cnew industrialism.\u201d Industrial policy is pro-liferating all over the world. The U.S. government is leading the trend of adopting such policies in an effort to boost domestic industrial production. Describing this strategy as \u201cindustrial\u201d was as unexpected as the adoption of a government inter-vention policy. In a further surprising move, U.S. offcials speak about integrating domestic industrial policy with foreign trade policy as part of one \u201cbroader international economic policy.\u201d Calls for an \u201calternative to the WTO\u201d have also been repeatedly voiced. A \u201cnew internationalism\u201d is emerging. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These developments are unfolding against the backdrop of an ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China\u2014probably the most dramatic economic event of the last decades. The trade war between the two superpowers is morphing into a tech war. New industrial and trade policies primarily focus on maintaining, advancing, and developing new comparative advantages in the race for digital technology dominance. Economic statecraft, both as an ideology and as a tool in foreign affairs, is also becoming mainstream. New international economic agreements and new international marketcrafting refect these changes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Financial and economic crises, pandemics, border closures, supply chain disruptions, wars, political uncertainty have fundamentally changed the way governments view economic development. Broad-based government interventions are now the order of the day. Many names have been given to the emerging new economics of in-tervention: \u201chomeland economics,\u201d the \u201cnew productivism paradigm,\u201d \u201csupply side progressivism,\u201d \u201cneomercantilism,\u201d \u201cnew&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,448],"tags":[446,244,447,399],"class_list":["post-4254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-2","category-57-2","tag-industrial-policy","tag-international-trade","tag-new-internationalism","tag-trade-agreement"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/58"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4254"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4276,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4254\/revisions\/4276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}