 {"id":4296,"date":"2025-08-19T04:20:40","date_gmt":"2025-08-19T04:20:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/?p=4296"},"modified":"2025-08-19T04:27:21","modified_gmt":"2025-08-19T04:27:21","slug":"women-judges-in-a-masculine-court-how-judicial-authority-legal-area-and-the-image-of-the-ideal-judge-are-gendered-in-the-taiwanese-judiciary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/2025\/08\/19\/women-judges-in-a-masculine-court-how-judicial-authority-legal-area-and-the-image-of-the-ideal-judge-are-gendered-in-the-taiwanese-judiciary\/","title":{"rendered":"Women Judges in a Masculine Court: How Judicial Authority, Legal Area and the Image of the Ideal Judge are Gendered in the Taiwanese Judiciary (Vol. 56.2)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Taiwanese judiciary has reached gender parity in number in the<br>2020s, so that women judges now occupy more than fifty percent of positions<br>at all three levels of the court. However, the internal gender dynamics are complex. This Article uses two sets of conceptual tools to analyze and identify the<br>male-centered and masculine features of the Taiwanese judiciary: the gendered<br>organization by Joan Acker and hegemonic masculinities by R.W. Connell.<br>Specifically, this Article first identifies a mainstream power relationship, which<br>I term authority-conforming, and shows how it is gendered to benefit a masculine authority. Second, the ways in which legal area is valued are also gendered.<br>Legal areas involving domestic affairs are marginalized and looked down upon<br>in the profession despite their complexity. The juvenile and family divisions<br>lack resources and manpower, and judges serving in this area are deemed less<br>capable. Third, women judges in Taiwan face another version of the double<br>bind: if she fully commits to her career, she is restrained from a balanced life;<br>but if she accentuates her family role as a supportive parent, spouse or caregiver, she reinforces the traditional stereotype in the Taiwanese legal sector<br>that women shall choose judgeship, a stable desk job, to accommodate their<br>domestic duties. Next, a separate section presents preliminary evidence on the<br>qualitative change brought about by female judges. Diversification of leadership style, the ideal image, and normative qualities of a good judge, are positive<br>developments. Data used in this Article includes archival documents, field<br>observations, and in-depth interviews with fourteen judges (twelve female and<br>two male judges) and one female prosecutor from six jurisdictions at all three<br>levels of the Taiwanese court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Taiwanese judiciary has reached gender parity in number in the2020s, so that women judges now occupy more than fifty percent of positionsat all three levels of the court. However, the internal gender dynamics are complex. This Article uses two sets of conceptual tools to analyze and identify themale-centered and masculine features of the Taiwanese&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,24,450],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-2","category-symposium","category-56-2"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/58"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4296"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4296\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4303,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4296\/revisions\/4303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/cilj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}