 {"id":1639,"date":"2011-03-18T11:45:59","date_gmt":"2011-03-18T15:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cornelljlpp.wordpress.com\/?p=139"},"modified":"2011-03-18T11:45:59","modified_gmt":"2011-03-18T15:45:59","slug":"law-and-blog-an-unhappy-marriage-in-its-own-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/2011\/03\/18\/law-and-blog-an-unhappy-marriage-in-its-own-way\/","title":{"rendered":"Law and Blog: An Unhappy Marriage (In its own way)"},"content":{"rendered":"Law and Blog meet.\n\nLaw and Blog meet online, of course. So as you might expect, they are  coy and are not particularly forthcoming with the details of their  courtship. But once together, their relationship builds quickly \u2014 they  share snark, irreverence and a proclivity for communicating and  organizing bite-sized pieces of life.\n\nTime passes, and Law and Blog find that their pairing has filled a  deep expressional void. Law can finally cast off its Bluebook shackles  and emote the way it deserves. And Blog cherishes the credence, utility  and stability that Law provides.\n\nThen one day, Law and Blog become bLawg.\n\nThe same love ditty that begat one bLawg, begat many. Law professors  in particular, but practitioners, law students and interested others  flock to the medium. From Above the Law to Dorf on Law \u2014bLawgs are the  antidote to and evidence of what is a true malady. Some of us <em>crave<\/em> escape from the strictures of formal legal writing.\n\nThe incumbent board of the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy inherited a, well, a barely <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/cornelljlpp.wordpress.com\/\">blog<\/a>.  It is a space carved out of the Internet terrain that has become our  project to activate. \u201cKill it!\u201d one of my law professors told me. And,  no, we won\u2019t yet, but a legal journal and a blog are not easy  bedfellows.<!--more-->\n\nLaw journals are not all alike; but every unhappy journal is unhappy  in its own way. That is to say, as Tolstoy did with his famous first  words of <em>Anna Karenina<\/em>, that the starting point is recognizing  that there are secret problems. Tolstoy\u2019s families, drawing rooms and  stratified classes of 19th century Russia all suffered certain  unhappinesses and frustrations that were largely undiagnosed.\n\nAs <em>Anna Karenina<\/em> reveals, these problems were undiagnosed because they were <em>in their own way<\/em>,  insularly, exclusionarily stuck. Despite rapid industrialization,  Tolstoy\u2019s society and its players were entrenched. His characters  struggled to know themselves and each other because, though they  collided, they lacked forums in which to express, emote and relate.\n\nSo this too is our project; let\u2019s try to un-stick something in law  journals by asking what makes them sometimes unhappy and by giving  members, readers and writers more free-ranging voice. What is the role  of legal blogging today? How can it help journals and what can the JLPP  Blog be?\n\nDavid Brooks has a new blog. He is The New York Times columnist most  read by both sides of the aisle, probably ever. Tavi Gevinson has a  blog. When she started blogging she was an 11-year-old in Illinois with  an obsession for <em>avante garde <\/em>fashion and a knack for taking  pictures of herself in mismatched patterns. Some guy I know has a  sister-in-law in California who is blogging 100 ways of cooking pork  shoulder, which is one of the cheapest cuts of meat you can buy.\n\nBut a law journal blog, as I dream it, has the potential to solve  some of the endemic legal writing problems. Who wants to read what a  gaggle of Cornell law students has to say about various law and policy  issues important to them? I am not sure yet. But I hope it can be a  space for students to write quickly, regularly, contemporarily,  pre-emption free. I hope it can be something of a property grab, where  students can represent legal and policy ideas that they define, that are  not defined by precedent, by form, by boilerplate or by a social  network template.\n\nJLPP and law journals around the country publish physical print  volumes with embossed covers; elegant mastheads; and hours of sourcing,  proving and editing labor behind each line. But who picks them up and  holds an issue of a law journal in hand? Who asks the student editors  what the process and printed scholarship mean to them? And most  significantly, what does it mean to legal academia, to the evolution of  legal thought, that the seminal writings are written so that 2Ls can  understand them and will want to publish them?\n\nTolstoy\u2019s project was telescopic; the idea was that the Annas and the  Vronskys and the 19th century Russian milieus could get better, could  improve their philosophies, their loves and their families in their <em>own way<\/em>. Thus, I return to romance and blargon.\n\nMaybe it works out at JLPP between Law and Blog, but maybe it does  not work out after all at. Don\u2019t worry. The Law will surely keep at it,  will hornbook, will firm, will evolve slowly and methodically. And Blog,  well Blog will be fine too. In fact, Blog will be more than fine,  because it is proactive not reactive, courageous not safe, and \u2014 like  Tolstoy\u2019s Anna \u2014 it took a good hard look at the train tracks, or  rather, the printed volumes of law journals, and it will strive for  something surplus.\n\nAnna was at the end how she was when Vronsky first saw her: \u201ca  surplus of something so overflowed her being that it expressed itself  beyond her will.\u201d Don\u2019t do the minimum Cornell Law Schoolers, JLPPers \u2026  bLawg!\n\nI will be blogging about veganism, professional athletes, \u201cthe veil  of ignorance\u201d and market fetishists, among other things. More  importantly, some of my friends, fellow JLPPers and Cornell Law Students  will be blogging about law and policy issues relevant to them and the  journal.\n\nVery special thanks to James McHale (JLPP Editor-in-Chief), Charlie  Lopresto (JLPP Internet Editor), Professor Michael Dorf (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dorfonlaw.org\/\">Dorf on Law<\/a>),  Tom Bruce and Sara Frug (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/\">LII<\/a>), and Iantha Haight (<a href=\"http:\/\/blog.law.cornell.edu\/library\/tag\/international-law\/\">The Competitive Edge<\/a>).\n\n<em>Sarah Hack is a second-year law student at Cornell Law School,  Senior Notes Editor for the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy and  head content developer of the new JLPP\u2008blog. She can be reached at <a href=\"mailto:srh92@cornell.edu\">srh92@cornell.edu<\/a>. <\/em>Barely Legal <em>appears alternate Fridays this semester. This article first appears in the Cornell Daily Sun, <a href=\"http:\/\/cornellsun.com\/section\/opinion\/content\/2011\/03\/18\/law-and-blog-unhappy-marriage\">here<\/a>.\n<\/em>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Law and Blog meet. Law and Blog meet online, of course. So as you might expect, they are coy and are not particularly forthcoming with the details of their courtship. But once together, their relationship builds quickly \u2014 they share snark, irreverence and a proclivity for communicating and organizing bite-sized pieces of life. Time passes,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[85,221,222,927,1349],"class_list":["post-1639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-student-blogs","tag-academia","tag-blogging","tag-blogs","tag-law","tag-sarah-hack"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/jlpp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}