{"id":2254,"date":"2020-09-16T13:12:03","date_gmt":"2020-09-16T13:12:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cornelllawreview.org\/?page_id=2254"},"modified":"2020-09-16T13:12:03","modified_gmt":"2020-09-16T13:12:03","slug":"clr-print-new","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/clr-print-new\/","title":{"rendered":"CLR Print – New"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Volume 105, Issue 5<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Articles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Notes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Volume 105, Issue 4<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Articles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Notes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Volume 105, Issue 3<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Articles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Notes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Remutualization<\/a><\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n

Erik F. Gerding, Professor of Law and Wolf-Nichol Fellow, University of Colorado Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lynn Stout heartily embraced heterodox economic theories for describing capital markets and a progressive zeal for reforming them. Yet when she came to formulate her policy prescriptions for financial markets, one of the most prominent progressive corporate and financial law scholars of the twentieth century could sometimes take these twin intellectual engines into surprisingly \u201cconservative\u201d…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

Artificial Agents in Corporate Boardrooms<\/a><\/h4>\n

Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci,\u00a0<\/span>Lecturer, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash Business School, Monash University<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Thousands of years ago, Roman businessmen often ran joint businesses through commonly owned, highly intelligent slaves. Roman slaves did not have full legal capacity and were considered property of their co-owners. Now business corporations are looking to delegate decision-making to uberintelligent machines through the use of artificial intelligence in boardrooms. Artificial intelligence in boardrooms could…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

A Democratic Political Economy For the First Amendment<\/a><\/h4>\n

Nelson Tebbe,\u00a0Jane M.G. Foster Professor of Law, Cornell Law School<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Today, the relationship between the First Amendment and distributive justice is fraught. Judges and other constitutional actors have been interpreting freedoms of speech and religion in a manner that unwinds government programs designed to ameliorate disparities of wealth, income, and other primary goods. And the regressive impact of actions grounded in these constitutional freedoms is…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Volume 105, Issue 5 Articles Notes Volume 105, Issue 4 Articles Notes Volume 105, Issue 3 Articles Notes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"current-issue-v2.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2254","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2254\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.lawschool.cornell.edu\/lawreview\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}