Since their relatively recent beginnings in 1977, anony- mous juries have been used across a litany of cases: organ- ized crime, terrorism, murder, sports scandals, police killings, and even political corruption. And their use is on the rise. An anonymous jury is a type of jury that a court may empanel in a criminal trial; if one is used, then information that might otherwise identify jurors is withheld from the parties, the pub- lic, or some combination thereof, for varying lengths of time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Though not without its benefits, anonymous juries raise questions regarding a defendant\u2019s presumption of innocence, the public\u2019s right to an open trial, the broad discretion afforded to judges, and the impacts of anonymity on juror decision- making. In fact, one mock jury experiment found that anony- mous jurors returned approximately 15% more guilty verdicts than their non-anonymous counterparts. The anonymous jury is unquestionably a potent tool that affords a court great flexi- bility to meet the exigencies of a trial head on. But its ex- traordinary characteristics counsel care in its empanelment. By adopting the Seventh Circuit\u2019s approach to anonymous ju- ries and requiring reasoned verdicts when they are used, anonymous juries may yet become an \u201cinspired, trusted, and effective\u201d instrument of justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n