Category: Articles
Tax Law as Muse
Brian Soucek
Professor of Law and Chancellor’s Fellow, University of California, Davis School of Law. Ph.D. (Philosophy), Columbia University; J.D., Yale Law School. The author beneftted from conversations on this topic with BJ Ard, Joseph Blocher, Gregory Day, Jonathan Neufeld, Robert Post, Daniel Rauch, Darien Shanske, Dennis Ventry, my co-panelists at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, the audience at the 2022 Pacifc Division Meeting of the American Society for Aesthetics, and participants at the Fourth Annual Art Law Works-in-Progress Colloquium at New England Law School and the Twelfth Annual Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference at Yale Law School. The author is also thankful for research help from David Holt and an unusual number of tireless research assistants: Heather Bates, Chester Dubov, Jon Morgan Florentino, Cobi Soda Furdek, Nicholas Mak-Wasek, Jane Martin, Jack Mensik, Sydney Simon, and Linda Tauscher. And the author is grateful to Dean Kevin Johnson, Dean Jessica Berg, and the UC Davis School of Law for supporting their (and my) work through the Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall Research Fund.
Jennifer C. Lena
Associate Professor of Arts Administration, Teachers College, Columbia University. Ph.D. (Sociology), Columbia University.
Admission charges at Chicago’s small music venues are generally exempt from tax. But a few years ago, officials came after clubs that hosted rock, hip-hop, country, and DJ performances, claiming that those kinds of music weren’t “commonly regarded as part of the fine arts.” Controversy exploded, critics derided the idea of turning tax collectors into…
May 2025
Is Death Different?
Jacob Bronsther
Associate Professor of Law, Michigan State University College of Law, J.D., M.Phil., Ph.D. For their incisive comments and discussion, the author is grateful to Andrea Armstrong, Rachel Barkow, Kristen Bell, David Blankfein-Tabachnick, Vincent Chiao, James Chen, Alma Diamond, Raff Donelson, Avlana Eisenberg, Sheldon Evans, Lindsay Farmer, Chad Flanders, Charles Fried, Jonathan Gingerich, John Goldberg, Linda Greene, Catherine Grosso, Irene Oritseweyinmi Joe, Erin Kelly, Alexandra Klein, Josh Kleinfeld, Guha Krishnamurthi, Nicola Lacey, Christopher Lewis, Marah McLeod, Erin Miller, Kathryn Miller, Erin Murphy, Carmel Nemirovksy, Alex Platt, Peter Ramsay, Shalev Roisman, Steve Schaus, Amy Sepinwall, Marissa Jackson Sow, Carol Steiker, Victor Tadros, Will Thomas, James Tierney, Robin West, and the participants of presentations at Harvard Law School, the Law and Humanities Junior Scholars Workshop at the University of Pennsylvania, the London School of Economics and Political Science, the Maryland Discussion Group on Constitutionalism, Michigan State University College of Law, the University of Oklahoma College of Law, the AALS Jurisprudence Section’s Works-in-Progress Workshop, the ABA-AALS-Academy for Justice Workshop, the Decarceration Works-in-Progress Workshop, and the Junior Scholars Legal Research Workshop. The authors thanks also Timothy Innes for his excellent research assistance, and Ryan Ming-Yuan Lee and his colleagues at the Cornell Law Review for their thoughtful work.
This Article attempts to unite the movements against the death penalty and mass incarceration. The central argument is that many noncapital sentences are in the same category of injury as the death penalty. Thus, whatever the law says (or ought to say) about the legitimacy of the death penalty, it should also say about these…
May 2025
Copyright’s Latent Space: Generative AI and the Limits of Fair Use
BJ Ard
Associate Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law School, and Affliate Fellow, Yale Information Society Project. The author thanks Oren Bracha, Robert Brauneis, Carys Craig, R. Feder Cooper, Rebecca Crootof, Deven Desai, Justin Hughes, Mark Lemley, Glynn Lunney, Michael Murray, David Nimmer, Jacob Noti-Victor, Blake Reid, Matthew Sag, Frederic Sala, Benjamin Sobel, Madhavi Sunder, Charlotte Tschider, Molly Shaffer Van Houweling, Christopher Yoo, and Peter Yu for feedback on this project, along with participants at the Fifth Annual Art Law Works-in-Progress Colloquium, 2024 Copyright Scholarship Round-table, UW Integrating Robots into the Future of Work Colloquium, 2024 Legal Scholars Roundtable on AI, Texas A&M School of Law Transformation in IP and Technology Law Symposium, 2024 Works-in-Progress for IP Colloquium, and faculty workshops at UGA and UW law schools. The author also thanks Kate Bishop, Peter Feider, John Lavanga, and Rosemary Patton for excellent research assistance. Research support was provided by the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education at UW with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
Generative AI poses deep questions for copyright law because it defies the assumptions behind existing legal frameworks. The tension surfaces most clearly in debates over fair use, where established tests falter in the face of generative systems’ distinctive features. This Article takes up the fair-use question to expose copyright’s limitations as well as its latent…
May 2025
Are Anticompetitive Contracts Enforceable? The Illegality Defense and Modern Anticompetitive Contracts
William Friedman
Trial Attorney, Civil Conduct Task Force, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice. Dartmouth College, A.B. 2011; J.D. Duke Law School, 2015. The views expressed in this article are personal to the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Department of Justice. The author thanks Scott Ballenger, Daniel Francis, Dan Guarnera, Devin Redding, and the Cornell Law Review editorial staff for their helpful comments and guidance.
This Article argues that contracts that violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act should not be enforceable. Although seemingly modest, courts do not accept this proposition. When a defendant in a breach of contract action raises the defense of “illegality” under the Sherman Act, courts will likely reject the defense unless the contractual provision at…
Apr 2025
Creditors, Shareholders, and Losers in Between: A Failed Regulatory Experiment
Albert H. Choi & Jeffery Y. Zhang
Paul G. Kauper Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School and Research Member at the European Corporate Governance Institute (“ECGI”); and Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. The authors thank Daryl Dietsche and Jacob Gerszten for outstanding research assistance as well as the following for insightful conservations: Lucy Chang, Gary Gorton, Howell Jackson, Ryan Rossner, Nicholas Tabor, Mark Van Der Weide, and seminar participants at Vanderbilt Law School, the Williams College Economics Department, the Sixth Conference on Law and Macroeconomics, the International Insolvency Institute Annual Meeting, the AALS Annual Conference, and the ALEA Annual Conference. Finally, the authors thank the editors of the Cornell Law Review for their helpful comments and suggestions.
In the aftermath of the 2007–08 Global Financial Crisis, regulators encouraged many of the world’s largest banks to hold a new type of regulatory instrument with the goal of improving their safety and soundness. The regulatory instrument was known as a “CoCo,” short for contingent convertible bond. CoCos are neither debt nor equity. They are…
Apr 2025
Social Network as Work: A Labor Paradigm for Regulating Speech on Social Media
Francesca L. Procaccini
Assistant Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School. For insightful comments and discussions, I thank Rebecca Allensworth, Jack Balkin, Lisa Bressman, Edward Cheng, Gregory Day, Evelyn Douek, Cynthia Estlund, Noah Feldman, Nikolas Guggenberger, Chris Guthrie, Claudia Haupt, Thomas Kadri, Daphne Keller, Genevieve Lakier, Artur Pericles Lima Monteiro, Martha Minow, Blake Reid, Peter Salib, Christopher Serkin, Daniel Sharfstein, Ganesh Sitaraman, Christopher Slobogin, Kevin Stack, Xiangnong (George) Wang, Laura Weinrib, and participants of the Yale Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference and Washington University School of Law Faculty Workshop. Special thanks to Francisco Collantes for superb research assistance and to the editors of the Cornell Law Review for impeccable editing.
Social media has eluded regulation by taking refuge in the First Amendment. The First Amendment, scholars and lawmakers overwhelmingly argue, is a formidable obstacle to regulation because social media facilitates the creation and exchange of speech by users. The received wisdom, therefore, characterizes users as consumers of a speech-related service, which inevitably does raise thorny…
Apr 2025
Animal Rights Before Legal Personhood
Ethan Prall
Fellow and Doctoral Student, University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science (JD, Harvard Law School; MTS, Duke University).
Growing scientific evidence shows that vast numbers of nonhuman animals are feeling, sentient beings, and ethicists have argued that this means they have moral value. However, law’s integration of individual animals as subjects with greater protection has been slow, despite the terrible threats that animals face today from human drivers like anthropogenic climate change and…
Mar 2025
The Law of Creativity?
Andres Sawicki
Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law; Director, Frost Institute for Data Science & Computing.
What are the barriers to progress? For decades, IP scholars had an easy answer: suboptimal private investment in public goods. Recent work on the psychology and sociology of creativity has, however, undermined this easy answer. Simply put, the level of private investment does not dictate the “Progress” of “Science and useful Arts.” As a result,…
Mar 2025
In Pursuit of Quality: Amplifying Panel Effects on the United States Courts of Appeals
John McCloud
J.D. Candidate, Cornell Law School, 2025. B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2020. Admissions & Membership Editor, Cornell Law Review Vol. 110.
The Shouldice Hospital, a medical center outside of Toronto, has become well known for bucking prevailing medical norms. Rather than performing the full panoply of medical services, like most hospitals, it focuses on a single type of surgery— hernia repair. The surgeons at Shouldice perform up to 800 hernia repairs per year, more than a…
Mar 2025
Mandating Nature’s Course
Sherry F. Colb & Michael C. Dorf
Sherry F. Colb was C.S. Wong Professor, Cornell Law School. She died in August 2022, leaving behind a partial and preliminary draft of this Article. Michael C. Dorf is Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School, and was married to Professor Colb from 1991 until her death. Because readying this Article for publication required a substantial amount of further research, writing, and editing, Professor Dorf has chosen to identify himself as a co-author to make clear that he bears responsibility for any errors that Professor Colb would have corrected if she had had the opportunity.
Laws that substantially restrict abortion, gender-affirming care, and aid in dying do not merely forbid particular acts; they effectively mandate burdensome bodily obligations. Yet many proponents of such restrictions purport to support a right to bodily autonomy in other contexts, for example by opposing public health vaccination and masking mandates. They distinguish the former restrictions…
Feb 2025
On “Death Houses” and “Kill Boxes”: The Death Penalty and Animal Slaughter
John H. Blume
Samuel F. Leibowitz Professor of Trial Techniques, Cornell Law School and Director the Cornell Death Penalty Project.
This Essay is somewhat unusual for a Symposium of this nature honoring the scholarship (and of course the memory) of my former colleague and friend Sherry Colb. I will not engage directly with an article or book Sherry did write, but rather with one that she didn’t. Sherry (and her husband and frequent coauthor Michael…
Feb 2025
What If Animals Are Moral Agents?
Taimie L. Bryant
Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law.
In an essay titled Should Animals Be Able to Sue People?, Professor Sherry Colb considers Justice v. Vercher, a lawsuit brought by Justice, a horse seeking damages for injuries resulting from his previous owner’s gross negligence. Gwendolyn Vercher had already been convicted of animal cruelty and paid the statutorily required restitution, but that restitution was limited to…
Feb 2025
Feminism, Theocracy, and Righteous Anger: Sherry Colb Unbound
Neil H. Buchanan
James J. Freeland Eminent Scholar and Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law; Visiting Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School and the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.
From May through August of 2022, Professor Sherry Colb wrote an impressive series of essays in furious response to what soon became Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a nearly final draft of which had been leaked before its official publication date. In All Hail Justice Coathanger, Gunning for Involuntary Pregnancy, and finally Alito and the Free Exercise of…
Feb 2025
In Defense of Katz: In Memory of Professor Sherry Colb
Erwin Chemerinsky
Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law.
Professor Colb addressed issues of privacy and the Fourth Amendment in many of her articles. A key aspect of her scholarship focused on the appropriate test for determining what is a search under the Fourth Amendment. Her article—A World Without Privacy: Why Property Does Not Define the Limits of the Right Against Unreasonable Searches and…
Feb 2025
Sherry Colb: Feminist Theorist and Social Change Agent
Deborah Dinner
Dorothea S. Clarke Professor of Law, Cornell Law School.
Social movements change hearts and minds by shifting how people understand what is true about the world around them. They start by making differences visible, centering lives and experiences previously pushed to cultural margins. Such differences are often at once biological and social, inherent and constructed. Feminist scholars and activists, for example, have grounded ethical…
Feb 2025
Race and a Revised Doctrine of Double Effect: A Reservation About Professor Colb’s Revision
Sheri Lynn Johnson
The James and Mark Flanagan Professor of Law, Cornell Law School.
Even as her life ebbed, Professor Sherry Colb was remarkably committed to scholarship. Among the works she produced in her last year was A New and Improved Doctrine of Double Effect: Not Just for Trolleys, posthumously published in the Connecticut Law Review. It was creative, enormously ambitious, wide-ranging, and entertaining—but, I think, at least in one crucial…
Feb 2025
A Pro-Feminist Life: Sherry Colb and Abortion Rights
Pamela S. Karlan
Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Stanford Law School.
In a classic work of feminist theory, The Mermaid and the Minotaur, Dorothy Dinnerstein described her project this way: “[T]o fight what seems about to destroy everything earthly that you love—to fight it not passively . . . , with denial; and not unrealistically, with blind force; but intelligently, armed with your central resource, which is…
Feb 2025
Dead Infants and Taking the Fifth
Tracey Maclin
Professor of Law and Raymond & Miriam Ehrlich Scholar Chair University of Florida Levin College of Law.
This Essay offers tribute to Professor Colb’s teachings and insights expressed in her writings on the Court’s Miranda and Self-Incrimination Clause rulings. Since the start of the twenty-first century, Professor Colb wrote many blogs on the Court’s Miranda doctrine. Miranda v. Arizona famously held that persons under arrest must be warned of their right to…
Feb 2025
New and Newer Ways of Thinking About the Fourth Amendment
Christopher Slobogin
Milton Underwood Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University.
Sherry Colb was one of the most innovative Fourth Amendment thinkers of her generation. Every criminal procedure buff has something to say about search and seizure law, but Sherry was one of the few scholars who added to the canon. In particular, her two articles in Columbia Law Review, Innocence, Privacy, and Targeting in Fourth…
Feb 2025
Desperate Times and Desperate Measures: When Is Rescuing Animals “Necessary?”
Mariann Sullivan
Sherry Colb and I didn’t always agree about everything. One of the things I valued most about her friendship was that, partly because of that, she was the perfect person to talk to in order to hone ideas. But, of course, it also mattered immensely that she was always respectful and generous and, of course,…
Feb 2025
Sherry Colb, Massiah, and Miranda
George C. Thomas III
Rutgers University Board of Governors Professor of Law & Judge Alexander P. Waugh, Sr. Distinguished Scholar.
I dislike subtitles but if I were to use one for this Article, it would be “Facing Miranda’s Consequences.” It is one kind of judicial act to decide that suspects should know that they do not have to answer police questions posed during custodial interrogation; this led the Supreme Court to require Miranda warnings. It…
Feb 2025
Using State Constitutions and International Human Rights Law to Compel Law Enforcement to Test Rape Kits
Penny M. Venetis
Distinguished Clinical Professor of Law, Associate Professor of Law, Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise Scholar, Director of the International Human Rights Clinic, Rutgers Law School.
There are 25,000 untested rape kits sitting in storage, around the United States, that are purposely not being tested by law enforcement, even though they contain DNA evidence that can easily help solve rapes. Law enforcement is deliberately not testing evidence that can solve violent sex crimes committed almost exclusively against girls and women. The…
Feb 2025
Judicial Institutionalism
Rachel Bayefsky
Associate Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law.
The idea of institutionalism figures prominently in today’s debates about the role of federal courts in American democracy. For example, Chief Justice Roberts is often described as an institutionalist who seeks to preserve the Supreme Court’s power or reputation. But what exactly is institutionalism, and should judges be institutionalists? Although institutionalism is invoked in public…
Dec 2024
Earning Trade Secrets
Joseph P. Fishman & Deepa Varadarajan
Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School, Associate Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law.
Every intellectual property right, like every property right generally, has a moment of birth. Whether and when that moment occurs depend on doctrines of original acquisition. In most IP regimes, these doctrines are so fundamental that they’ve been reduced to a single verb. One can get a patent only by inventing, or a copyright only…
Dec 2024
Reproductive Justice at Work: Employment Law after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Laura T. Kessler
S.J. Quinney Endowed Chair and Professor of Law, University of Utah, S.J. Quinney College of Law.
In June 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, landmark decisions which held that the U.S. Constitution protected a right to abortion prior to fetal viability. Overnight, about 64 million American women of childbearing age potentially lost the right to decide what…
Dec 2024
Natural‑Person Shareholder Voting
Michael Simkovic
USC Gould School of Law.
“One-share, one-vote” corporate governance often leads to inefficient negative externalities, even when shareholders care about direct harm to themselves and even if corporations respond to shareholder preferences. Because equity ownership is concentrated, while many externalities are more diffuse, corporate voting underweights externalities. But allocating votes according to the principle of “one person, one vote” creates…
Dec 2024
Altered Stakes: Reimagining the Amount-in-Controversy Requirement
Steven Gensler & Roger Michalski
Gene and Elaine Edwards Family Chair in Law, Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law, Professor of Law, University of Oklahoma College of Law.
Which state-law cases should Congress allow into federal court? Congress’s answer has always been “only the big ones.” This article revisits the choice to limit diversity jurisdiction to higher-value cases and critically examines how Congress has approached setting the amount threshold. It surveys alternate ways Congress could use case value to sort which cases make…
Sep 2024
Defense Lawyering in the Progressive Prosecution Era
Jenny Roberts
Dean and Professor of Law, Maurice A. Deane School of Law, Hofstra University.
The movement to elect so-called “progressive prosecutors” is relatively new, but there is a robust literature analyzing it from a number of angles. Scholars consider how to define “progressive prosecution,” look at the movement through a racial justice lens, and examine it in the context of rural spaces, deportation, and the pandemic. One essay even…
Sep 2024
Taxing Luxury Emissions
Clinton G. Wallace & Shelley Welton
Associate Professor of Law, University of South Carolina School of Law, Presidential Distinguished Professor of Law & Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and Kleinman Center for Energy Policy.
Recent economic and sociological studies have documented the rising challenge of carbon inequality—that is, extreme class disparities in carbon emissions both within the United States and globally. These studies show an alarming divide, with the top 10% of emitters producing half of all emissions and the top 1% alone producing 17% of emissions. Meanwhile, the…
Sep 2024
Arousal by Algorithm
Amy Adler
Emily Kempin Professor of Law, NYU School of Law.
The problem of Big Tech has consumed recent legal scholarship and popular discourse. We are reckoning daily with the threats that digital speech platforms like Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), TikTok, and YouTube pose to our personal and political lives. Yet while this conversation is raging in discussions about the impact of technology on…
Aug 2024