Volume 111, Issue 4
Articles
Michael W. Carroll† & Peter Jaszi††
†Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law.
Thanks to Pamela Samuelson, Rebecca Tushnet, Jonathan Band, Charles Duan, and participants in the 2024 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference at Berkeley Law School for helpful comments and to Jacqueline Jedrych for research assistance.
††Emeritus Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law.
This Article traces the intellectual history of copyright law’s fair use doctrine at the Supreme Court from its first encounter with fair use to its landmark decision slightly more than three decades ago in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Campbell provided courts with a coherent, user-centered theory for applying the four statutory fair use factors…
Brendan S. Maher
Professor of Law and Director, Health Law, Policy & Management Program, Texas A&M University School of Law. Stanford A.B.; Harvard J.D.
This Article builds in part upon ideas originally formed while litigating benefit and insurance disputes before the United States Supreme Court, including Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 577 U.S. 312 (2016) (representing Gobeille); Montanile v. Bd. of Trs. of Nat’l Elevator Indus. Health Benefit Plan, 577 U.S. 136 (2016) (representing Montanile); Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 571 U.S. 99 (2013) (representing Heimeshoff); U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. 88 (2013) (representing McCutchen); and Conkright v. Frommert, 559 U.S. 506 (2010) (representing Frommert). I would also like to thank Professors Norman Stein, Dana Muir, Matthew Lawrence, Natalya Shnitser, Elizabeth McCluskey, Amy Monahan, Valarie Blake, Jessica Roberts, and Shaun Martin, as well as all the attendees at the Thirteenth Annual Employee Benefits & Social Insurance Conference, for their valuable insights. I would also like to thank my superb research assistants, Gregory Fassuliotis and Brandon Robinson, for their tireless work. All errors are mine.
For decades, the dominant form of private health insurance in the United States—by far—has been employment-based group health insurance. Somewhere in the range of 175 million employees and their families receive health care coverage through a system in which employers serve as financiers, procurers, administrators, and fiduciaries of the health insurance promise. An overwhelming percentage…
Notes
Michael W. Carroll† & Peter Jaszi††
†Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law.
Thanks to Pamela Samuelson, Rebecca Tushnet, Jonathan Band, Charles Duan, and participants in the 2024 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference at Berkeley Law School for helpful comments and to Jacqueline Jedrych for research assistance.
††Emeritus Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law.
This Article traces the intellectual history of copyright law’s fair use doctrine at the Supreme Court from its first encounter with fair use to its landmark decision slightly more than three decades ago in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Campbell provided courts with a coherent, user-centered theory for applying the four statutory fair use factors…
Arin Sheehan
J.D., Cornell Law School, 2027; B.S. in Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, 2022.
Thank you to Professor Chang for inspiring this line of research and generously sharing your feedback and advice on this piece. As with all things, this work is dedicated to Sydney, Ellie, Lily, and Nolan.
“Marriage is a matter of more worth / Than to be dealt in by attorneyship.” William Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part I act 5, sc. 5, l. 55–56. A failed tenancy by the entirety occurs when a conveyance is made to an unmarried pair either as [1] tenants by the entirety or [2] as spouses; because…
Morgan Thomas
J.D., Cornell Law School, 2026; B.A., Public Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2021.
I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to Professor Chan Tov McNamarah and Jared Ham for their guidance, as well as the Cornell Law Review associates and editors for assisting in the publication of this Note.
The year is 2021. Parents are riddled with strife over their children learning about white supremacy, “critical race theory” is America’s new buzzword, and 1,648 books have been banned. Of those books, 40% featured protagonists or prominent secondary characters of color, 21% of the titles directly addressed issues of race and racism, and 10% of…
